Current:Home > ContactPlaintiffs in voting rights case urge judges to toss Alabama’s new congressional map -Capital Dream Guides
Plaintiffs in voting rights case urge judges to toss Alabama’s new congressional map
View
Date:2025-04-18 10:15:45
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — Voting rights activists are returning to court to fight Alabama’s redrawn congressional districts, saying state Republicans failed to follow federal court orders to create a district that is fair to Black voters.
Plaintiffs in the high-profile redistricting case filed a written objection Friday to oppose Alabama’s new redistricting plan. They accused state Republicans of flouting a judicial mandate to create a second majority-Black district or “something quite close to it” and enacting a map that continues to discriminate against Black voters in the state.
A special three-judge panel in 2022 blocked use of the the state’s existing districts and said any new congressional map should include two districts where “Black voters either comprise a voting-age majority” or something close. That panel’s decision was appealed by the state but upheld in June in a surprise ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court, which concurred that having only one Black-majority district out of seven — in a state where more than one in four residents is Black — likely violated federal law.
The plaintiffs in the case, represented by the NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund and other groups, asked the three-judge panel to step in and draw new lines for the state.
“Alabama’s new congressional map ignores this court’s preliminary injunction order and instead perpetuates the Voting Rights Act violation that was the very reason that the Legislature redrew the map,” lawyers representing the plaintiffs in the case wrote.
The new map enacted by the Republican-controlled Alabama Legislature maintained one-majority Black district but boosted the percentage of Black voters in the majority-white 2nd Congressional District, now represented by Republican Rep. Barry Moore, from about 30% to 39.9%
Lawyers representing plaintiffs in the case wrote Friday that the revamped district “does not provide Black voters a realistic opportunity to elect their preferred candidates in any but the most extreme situations.” They accused state Republicans of ignoring the courts’ directive to prioritize a district that would stay under GOP control “pleasing national leaders whose objective is to maintain the Republican Party’s slim majority in the U.S. House of Representatives.”
Alabama has maintained the new plan complies with the Voting Rights Act, and state leaders are wagering that the panel will accept their proposal or that the state will prevail in a second round of appeals to the Supreme Court. Republicans argued that the map meets the court’s directive and draws compact districts that comply with redistricting guidelines.
The state must file its defense of the map by Aug. 4. The three judges have scheduled an Aug. 14 hearing in the case as the fight over the map shifts back to federal court.
The outcome could have consequences across the country as the case again weighs the requirements of the Voting Rights Act in redistricting. It could also impact the partisan leanings of one Alabama congressional district in the 2024 elections with control of the U.S House of Representatives at stake.
Former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, chairman of the National Democratic Redistricting Committee, said in a statement that Alabama’s new map is a “brazen defiance” of the courts.
“The result is a shameful display that would have made George Wallace—another Alabama governor who defied the courts—proud,” Holder said in a statement.
veryGood! (9)
Related
- Sonya Massey's father decries possible release of former deputy charged with her death
- USC fires defensive coordinator Alex Grinch after disastrous performance against Washington
- Oklahoma State surges into Top 25, while Georgia stays at No. 1 in US LBM Coaches Poll
- Kevin Harvick says goodbye to full-time NASCAR racing after another solid drive at Phoenix
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- Jennifer Garner Shows Rare PDA With Boyfriend John Miller on Lunch Date
- Three found dead inside Missouri home; high levels of carbon monoxide detected
- Polish president to appoint new prime minister after opposition coalition’s election win
- Selena Gomez engaged to Benny Blanco after 1 year together: 'Forever begins now'
- I can't help but follow graphic images from Israel-Hamas war. I should know better.
Ranking
- Israel lets Palestinians go back to northern Gaza for first time in over a year as cease
- Teen arrested in Southern California restaurant shooting that injured 4 last month
- Trump takes aim at DeSantis at Florida GOP summit
- Albania agrees to temporarily house migrants who reach Italy while their asylum bids are processed
- Macy's says employee who allegedly hid $150 million in expenses had no major 'impact'
- 'She made me feel seen and heard.' Black doulas offer critical birth support to moms and babies
- Blinken seeks to contain Israel-Hamas war; meets with Middle East leaders in Jordan
- Italy grants citizenship to terminally ill British baby after Vatican hospital offers care.
Recommendation
Intellectuals vs. The Internet
Trial opens for ex-top Baltimore prosecutor charged with perjury tied to property purchases
Savannah Chrisley Shows How Romance With Robert Shiver Just Works With PDA Photos
Ariana Madix reacts to ex Tom Sandoval getting booed at BravoCon: 'It's to be expected'
Federal hiring is about to get the Trump treatment
Ethiopia says disputed western Tigray will be settled in a referendum and displaced people returned
Man in Hamburg airport hostage drama used a rental car and had no weapons permit
Tupac Shakur Way: Oakland street named in rapper's honor, 27 years after his death